Did Kumar Dharmasena Secretly Help England? Umpire’s DRS Signal In IND Vs ENG 5th Test Sparks Cheating Controversy

TribeNews
5 Min Read

Day 1 of the fifth and final Test between India and England at The Oval turned controversial as experienced Sri Lankan umpire Kumar Dharmasena found himself at the centre of a DRS (Decision Review System) storm. A subtle hand gesture made by Dharmasena during a key LBW appeal sparked a massive debate on social media and among cricket pundits, with many accusing him of influencing England’s decision not to review.

 https://t.co/04PYjgM7su pic.twitter.com/LJuKFV5Own

- Advertisement -

— Star Sports (@StarSportsIndia) July 31, 2025

Also Read: Meet Brooke Hogan, Daughter Of Wrestling Icon Hulk Hogan, Now A Singer, Actress, And Entrepreneur

- Advertisement -

The incident unfolded in the 13th over of India’s innings, when Josh Tongue bowled a lethal inswinging yorker to Sai Sudharsan. The ball struck Sudharsan low on the pad, and England immediately went up in a loud LBW appeal. While it initially appeared the delivery was going down leg, Dharmasena’s response added a layer of confusion—and controversy.

Suspicious Gesture Raises Eyebrows

- Advertisement -

Instead of a neutral stance, Dharmasena subtly pointed to his finger, appearing to indicate an inside edge. This small but significant gesture saw England refrain from taking the review—a move that would later prove crucial, as replays confirmed that the ball had indeed nicked Sudharsan’s bat before hitting the pad.

This moment, seemingly minor in real-time, set the cricketing world abuzz. Many fans and former players questioned whether an umpire’s job was to impartially adjudicate or to subtly guide teams during DRS decisions—especially when each team only has three unsuccessful reviews per innings.

History Repeats? Similarities with the 2008 Sydney Test

- Advertisement -

The controversy reminded cricket followers of the infamous 2008 Sydney Test, where umpires Steve Bucknor and Mark Benson were heavily criticised for a series of poor decisions against India. Eight incorrect calls were recorded in that Test, many of which tilted the momentum in Australia’s favour, leading to widespread outrage and a formal complaint from the BCCI.

While Dharmasena’s case isn’t as dramatic or deliberate, the integrity of umpiring once again finds itself under scrutiny. The rise of DRS was meant to minimise human error—but when umpires subtly hint at what they’ve seen, it raises ethical concerns about indirectly influencing the game’s outcome.

Sanjay Bangar Slams ‘Second Nature Habits’

- Advertisement -

Reacting to the incident on Star Sports, former India all-rounder Sanjay Bangar minced no words in criticising Dharmasena. “These habits don’t go away easily,” Bangar said. “Back when Dharmasena started umpiring, there was no DRS. But today, such gestures are not acceptable. The umpire’s body language should remain neutral, especially during that critical 15-second window.”

Bangar’s frustration echoed that of fans who felt India might have been disadvantaged by the umpire’s subtle prompt to England.

Anil Chaudhary Defends Dharmasena: ‘It Happens in Flow’

Amid the criticism, Indian umpire Anil Chaudhary came to Dharmasena’s defence. In an interview with MyKhel, Chaudhary said, “It just happens by mistake. No umpire at this level will do it deliberately. Sometimes, in the flow of the game, we forget the presence of DRS and react instinctively.”

While his defence was measured and empathetic, it still underscores the need for stricter adherence to umpiring protocol in the DRS era, especially in high-stakes games.

Impact on the Series & Cricketing Trust

This wasn’t just a flashpoint for social media outrage—it added fuel to the broader conversation about trust in umpiring. With the IND vs ENG Test series already full of heated moments, this controversy further heightened tensions. While India ended Day 1 with a steady top-order start, the DRS drama could’ve easily altered the course of the innings had England opted to review.

As cricket evolves with technology, incidents like these emphasize that human influence, even unintentional, still shapes the game. The ICC may now have to revisit protocols and training for umpires, particularly regarding non-verbal communication during reviews.

Stay informed on all the latest news, real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in india news andworld News on Zee News.

Leave a Comment
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected & This Is Prohibited!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads and you are also not using our official app. Your Account Have been Flagged and reported, pending de-activation & All your earning will be wiped out. Please turn off the software to continue

You cannot copy content of this app